It was officially launched with a paper at IChemE Hazards XXII conference in Liverpool (April 11-14 2011), presented by author Dr. Ed Smith, DNV.
Historically, analysis of technical failures in major accident hazard (MAH) safety reports/cases has dominated over human failures. There are some signs that this is beginning to change with a higher volume of human factors (HF) analyses being conducted.
Regulators are also responding to public expectations concerning proactive risk management, with requirements that safety critical human tasks are comprehensively analysed and their risk appropriately assessed.
Guidance on human factors safety critical task analysis aims to help fill this gap. The intention is that HF SCTA will become part of the wider safety assessment toolbox, leading to better integration of human failure assessment into safety studies.
This publication has drawn on many existing sources from the public domain, and has supplemented these with input from practitioners and case study material provided by industry. It provides:
- a 7-step methodology for conducting SCTA;
- an overview of the most commonly used task analysis techniques;
- example outputs from SCTAs;
- case studies;
- supporting practical tools used or developed by industry, and
- examples of good and bad practice.
Guidance on human factors safety critical task analysis is aimed primarily at those without an HF background but who have some knowledge of safety risk assessment, and is available to download or purchase from www.energyinst.org/scta.